Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Shapiro v. Goldman
as 16-3097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Shapiro
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Sachs Goldman, Nicholas L. McQuaid, Preet Bharara and others
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Metlife Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shapiro v. Goldman et al
as 1:2014cv10119
Plaintiff:
Mark Shapiro
Defendant:
Daniel Sachs Goldman, Nicholas McQuaid, Preet Bharara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhoades et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01788
Plaintiff:
Chad Rhoades and Luis Urbina
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhoades et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
as 2:2010at00951
Plaintiff:
Chad Rhoades and Luis Urbina
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Azpilcueta v. The State of Nevada, ex. rel. Transportation Authority et al
as 3:2009cv00593
Plaintiff:
Daiana Azpilcueta
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, ex. rel. Transportation Authority, Department of Public Safety, Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
