Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Triller, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00090
Plaintiff:
Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment US Latin LLC, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant:
Triller, Inc.
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Triller, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07380
Plaintiff:
Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment US Latin LLC, Arista Records LLC and others
Defendant:
Triller, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 22-1451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ARISTA MUSIC, ARISTA RECORDS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NONESUCH RECORDS INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications, Incorporated
as 21-1168
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMI FEIST CATALOG INC., ROADRUNNER RECORDS, INC., FUELED BY RAMEN LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COXCOM, LLC and COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., W.B.M. MUSIC CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS and others
Warner Records Inc et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00874
Plaintiff:
Stone Diamond Music Corp., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
EMI Algee Music Corp., Capitol Records, LLC, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Counter Defendant:
Volcano Entertainment III, LLC, Universal Music Publishing AB, EMI Jemaxal Music Inc. and others
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc., Jill Lesser, Recording Industry Association of America, The and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors
Intervenor:
Cox Communications, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
BCS Computers LLC
Special Master:
Regina M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00950
Plaintiff:
Universal Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc. and CoxCom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Digital Age Music Publishing, LLC v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00451
Plaintiff:
The Digital Age Music Publishing, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Hall, Bernhard Herms, Provident Label Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0102
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Naruss Mahakkapong, et al
as 6:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings, Inc. , Capitol Records, LLC , Sony Music Entertainment and others
Defendant:
Ron Puryear , Georgia Lee Puryear , Puryear Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
In Re: Record Company Infringement Litigation
as 6:2015cv00708
Defendant:
Tim Foley, Naruss Mahakkapong, Samornsri Mahakkapong doing business as Forever and a Day doing business as Forever and a Day North America also known as Nuchie Joe and others
In Re:
Record Company Infringement Litigation
Special Master:
Orran L. Brown
Plaintiff:
Arista Music, Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
