Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camoras v. Publishers Clearing House
as 2:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
James Camoras
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Camoras v. Publishers Clearing House
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
James Camoras
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Publishers Clearing House LLC
as 2:2023cv04734
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Publishers Clearing House LLC
as 2:2023cv04735
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Sutherland v. Publishers Clearing House, LLC
as 1:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Raleigh Sutherland
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SUTHERLAND v. PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE LLC
as 1:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Raleigh Sutherland
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pett v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc.
as 2:2022cv11389
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Pett, Kathleen Fick-Gee, Michelle Holcomb and others
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House, Inc.
Rioux v. Publishers Clearing House et al
as 1:2022fp00129
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Rioux
Defendant:
Publishers Clearing House and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
