Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LAPIN et al v. COX et al
as 2:2026cv12333
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LAPIN and MARGARET LAPIN
Defendant:
CARRIE S. COX, ROBERT ESSNER, ALAN EZEKOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Johnson et al v. Puma United North America, LLC
as 1:2026cv13987
Plaintiff:
Carl Johnson and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Puma United North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Michael A Sloan v. Puma Dart Products Ltd. et al
as 5:2026cv04556
Plaintiff:
Michael A Sloan
Defendant:
Puma Dart Products Ltd., Shot Dartz NZ Ltd., Peter Anthony Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lemense v. Puma United North America, LLC
as 1:2026cv12654
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lemense
Defendant:
Puma United North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Lemense v. Puma United North America, LLC et al
as MA/1:26-cv-12654
Plaintiff:
Lemense
Defendant:
Puma United North America, LLC
Cox v. DOJ, CIA, FBI, John Doe department informants, US Marshals, Doccs, Spay, The United States of et al
as 1:2026cv04632
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
DOJ, CIA, FBI, John Doe department informants, US Marshals, Doccs, Spay, The United States of, Nike Inc., Puma 50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
