Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Rounds v. PUMA North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv09468
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, inclusive and PUMA North America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travis Rounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PUMA SE et al v. Brooks Sports Inc
as 2:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
PUMA North America Inc and PUMA SE
Defendant:
Brooks Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gregory Alan Foster v. Puma North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09372
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Foster
Defendant:
Puma North America, Inc., MB1 Enterprises LLC, Melo LaFrance Ball and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PUMA SE et al v. Brooks Sports Inc
as 2:2023cv00116
Counter Defendant:
PUMA SE and PUMA North America Inc
Counter Claimant:
Brooks Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Miguel Licea v. Puma North America, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01939
Plaintiff:
Miguel Licea
Defendant:
Puma North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
