Cases 1 - 10 of 305
Bowman v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Timouth Bowman
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henderson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Javonte Henderson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sisk v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 8:2024cv02355
Plaintiff:
Billy Sisk
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation a corporation doing business as QT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Fuss v. Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Fuss
Defendant:
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., Circle K Stores, Inc., City Hive Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
King v. Harper et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Dorzell King
Defendant:
Jacob Harper and QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Keys v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Sarah Jackson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation doing business as QuikTrip #180 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Palacio v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 0:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Towana Palacio
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Taylor v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Joackwa Taylor
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anderson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Lionel Anderson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
