Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Jones et al v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Chantal B. Jones , Quincy Jones, Jr. and Asanna Bishop
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv01470
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Quincy Jones and Annie Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jones v. Cumberland County et al
as 5:2012ct03160
Plaintiff:
Jerry Quincy Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. Cumberland County, Cumberland County, Chub Group of Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cumberland County et al
as 4:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Jerry Quincy Jones
Defendant:
Sheriff's Dept. Cumberland County, Cumberland County, Chub Group of Insurance Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Adam Jone
as 12-1224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADAM QUINCY JONES
Michael Donald Jones v. Quincy Jones et al
as 2:2012cv01159
Defendant:
Does, Bill Gibson, Hal Leonard Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Donald Jones
JONES et al v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
QUINCY JONES and MIRACLE JACKSON
Defendant:
WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC., WOLTERS KLUWER UNITED STATES, INC. and PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beasley et al v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv02765
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Beasley, John Cloud, Wilbert Johnson and others
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Macy
as 5:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Adam Flores
Defendant:
NFN Macy and Quincy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Williamson et al
as 5:2010ct03024
Plaintiff:
Jerry Quincy Jones
Defendant:
Nurse Williamson, Muhammad Wasi Haq, Archie Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
