Cases 1 - 10 of 699
Quintanilla v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Daniel Quintanilla
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Quintanilla-Rivas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2293
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANTONIO QUINTANILLA-RIVAS, HILDA LISSETH CANJURA-MANCIA, JORDAN MATTEO QUINTANILLA-CANJURA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Molina De Acevedo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1848
Petitioner:
KARLA MELISSA MOLINA DE ACEVEDO, MAILYN ALONDRA ACEVEDO-MOLINA and ADONYS GILBERTO ACEVED-QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguilar-Quintanilla v. Garland
as 24-60142
Petitioner:
Edgard Ernesto Aguilar-Quintanilla
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
QUINTANILLA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
ROY QUINTANILLA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CP IV 8 Olive LLC v. Monica Quintanilla
as 2:2024cv01648
Plaintiff:
CP IV 8 Olive LLC
Defendant:
Monica Quintanilla
Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-973
Petitioner:
DEMAR MARTINEZ, ANA QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ and EDGAR QUINTANILLA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quintanilla v. Zanbofer Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Quintanilla
Defendant:
Zanbofer Inc. as assignee of d/b/a Delicacies Gourmet, Zanbocafe Inc., 1354 Old Northern Blvd. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nelson et al v. Sierzega et al
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Larice Nelson, Shyheim Hurde, Sammie Gage and others
Defendant:
William T. Sierzega, Quontez L. Harrington, Scott J. Pietryla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orozco v. Stairs et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Noah Orozco
Defendant:
Janice Stairs, Karl Hanneman, David Peat and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
