Cases 1 - 10 of 98
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06183
Plaintiff:
John R McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Audrey McAdams v. Susan E. Arnold et al
as 2:2023cv10542
Plaintiff:
Audrey McAdams
Defendant:
Susan E. Arnold, Mary T. Barra, Safra A. Catz and others
Burleson v. McDonald, et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jamie Dean Burleson
Defendant:
Tyler R. McDonald, Andrew Dylan Taylor, Jack Van Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Robert A. Chapek et al
as 1:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Robert A. Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Nominal Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Abdul Shabazz v. Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-2824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL HAQQ SHABAZZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and DR. VINCENT CARR
Appellee:
BALLARD SPAHR LLP, MATTHEW G. SUMMERS, BRITTANY M. GIUSINI and others
Abdul Shabazz v. Vincent Carr
as 22-2825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL HAQQ SHABAZZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. VINCENT CARR
Appellee:
BALLARD SPAHR LLP, MATTHEW G. SUMMERS, BRITTANY M. GIUSINI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
