Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Everett v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derek Everett
Defendant:
Michelle Barnes, Natalie Vimont, Tamara Krieger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Etienne v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Etienne
Defendant:
City of Chicago, R. Rodriquez (#12157) and Lukasz Murzanski (#9407)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49877
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO R RODRIQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Michelle R Rodriquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Goodfriend et al
as 6:2015cv06608
Plaintiff:
Marlon Williams
Defendant:
Cody Goodfriend, Timothy Pancor, R. Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearmond v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Dearmond
Defendant:
United States of America, Karen Edenfield, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Brown et al
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
Abram Jordan
Defendant:
S.B. Brown, J. Pilcher, R. Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passineau v. Oxborrow et al
as 1:2012cv01894
Plaintiff:
Brett Passineau
Defendant:
W. Oxborrow, E. Cantu, R. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIQUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv53622
Plaintiff:
MANUEL R. RODRIQUEZ, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Thomas v. Villanueva et al
as 2:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
Destry Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Susana Villanueva, Wassel Lewis, Julie Backus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
