Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Green v. Rose et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Dominick Green
Defendant:
R Rose, C Pabst, City of Mesquite TX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Stirling
as 0:2023cv05261
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
ROSE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R ROSE JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nealson v. Maynard et al
as 7:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Mr. Maynard, Mr. Ball, Mr. Cassey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Office of Attorney General et al
as 4:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
Tebtu Shekem'Kha Bey
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General, Cynthia R Rose, Marilyn Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rose v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 0:2023cv01532
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Westphal v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Lauren Westphal
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company and Kenneth R Rose
Not Classified By Court:
Louis Rainey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rose v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
as 2:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Palmer
as 0:2023cv01022
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Warden
as 0:2022cv02050
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
