Cases 71 - 80 of 428
Acosta v. N&B Lundy Corp. et al
as 4:2019cv00519
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
N&B Lundy Corp., The Pitter Patter Day School Health Plan and Bobbi Jo Lundy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States Department of Labor v. Ghosn et al
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor and R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Samir Ghosn and The Chateau of Lawton Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Iocca et al
as 2:2019cv10371
Defendant:
Rebecca Iocca, David Iocca, DJI & Associates, Inc. SIMPLE IRA Plan and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta vs. Robert Walton, Jr. et al.
as 2:2019cv00926
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Robert Walton, Jr. and HADSELL CHEMICAL PROCESSING SIMPLE IRA PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Trans Express, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01423
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Trans Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, v. Fensler
as 1:2019cv00497
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
David Fensler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Tokyo Sushi Omaha, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Tokyo Sushi Omaha, LLC and Kong Shun ("Randy") Gao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Durbins of Manteno, Inc., et al
as 1:2019cv01653
Defendant:
Two-Toms, Inc, Henry's Dod-Sons, Inc, Durbins and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Acosta v. Good et al
as 3:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
William H Winn, Jr, Steven Matthew Good, Smartcore LLC Group Health Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
v. Acosta et al
as 3:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Smartcore LLC, William H Winn, Jr, R. Alexander Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
