Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 24-6391
Plaintiff:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant:
PETER T. DANZA, JASON JARMAN, ANTHONY J. TAYLOR and others
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Mark Wahl, T. McDermott, George M. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Meier et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
David R. Hall
Defendant:
Debbie Meier, Ashley Tinkle, Kathy Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
David R. Hall
Defendant:
Chris Newton and Jennifer Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 23-2344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, Superintendent at SCI Waymart, GEORGE LITTLE, Acting Secretary of Corrections and T. MCDERMOTT, Grievance Coordinator
Jefferson (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Jefferson
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Moses (I) Andre Stancil, Chris Lobanov-Rostovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Wahl et al
as 3:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Hall
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Wahl, T. McDermott and George M. Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strampher v. Rivers et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Rodger Strampher
Defendant:
NFN Rivers, R Hall and NFN Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
