Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv02382
Plaintiff:
Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Wade et al
as 7:2026cv01682
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dewayne White
Defendant:
Sheriff Jody Wade, Ernie Wilson and Lee Rhine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Cortes Distribution, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tortilla Lee
Defendant:
Cortes Distribution, LLC and Casino Nieves Muino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lee v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02380
Plaintiff:
Mizell Lee
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Judd vs Powel, et al
as 3:2026cv00708
Petitioner:
Kody Lee Judd
Respondent:
Ryan Powel and Stephen B. Rye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00296
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Crayton v. Boston Housing Authority, et al
as 26-2044
Plaintiff:
COREY CRAYTON
Defendant:
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ERNESTO SALVIN, Custodian, SHERRI ADAMS, Manager and others
BUZZ et al v. JOY et al
as 2:2026cv00615
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A. BUZZ, MARC YATES and JOSHUA TORPY
Defendant:
BILL JOY, CHARLES FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
