Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Keith Warren v. NDOC, et al
as 22-16099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S. POWERS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Keith Warren v. S. Powers, et al
as 22-15338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
S. POWERS, CHANDRA THOMAS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Dodds v. Thomas et al
as 2:2018cv02802
Defendant:
J Guilin, Unknown Narvayez, Unknown Demon and others
Plaintiff:
James Dodds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Miller v. David Everett, et al
as 16-16745
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK A. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EVERETT, JOHN KEAST, ISIDRO BACA and others
Lash v. Baca et al
as 3:2016cv00324
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, C.O's, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
John Lash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Everett et al
as 3:2016cv00128
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Mary Eaton and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv06259
Plaintiff:
KHALIF R. MEARS
Defendant:
CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. , STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION , SP PLUS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
AMTRAK , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cross_defendant:
BRANDYWINE CIRA, LP., BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST, CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mears et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15240
Plaintiff:
Maura R. Mears and Doyle Mears
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEARS v. A. L. BURBANK & COMPANY LTD.
as 2:2011cv48722
Plaintiff:
JACK R. MEARS
Defendant:
A. L. BURBANK & COMPANY LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ABDULLA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71875
Plaintiff:
JACK R MEARS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
