Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Miller v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Doug R. Miller
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN F. KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, Warden, DIANNE R. MILLER, Associate Warden Programs/Housing and others
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv27802
Plaintiff:
Janice R. Miller and William Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv26361
Plaintiff:
Donna R. Miller and John E. Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy v. RPM Management Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03171
Plaintiff:
Tyler McCoy
Defendant:
RPM Management Group Inc , RPM James Island Inc , RPM Summerville Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv22111
Plaintiff:
Pansy M. Miller and Lanny R. Miller
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Adrian F. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Marvin C. Plumley , Dianne R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2014cv14537
Plaintiff:
Adrian F. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , Marvin C. Plumley , Dianne R. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09941
Plaintiff:
Joan R. Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Miller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
