Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Retirement Trust and the Trustees Thereof et al v. RH Mullen, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Retirement Trust and the Trustees Thereof, Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Health and Welfare Fund and the Trustees Thereof and Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union No. 33 Education Fund and the Trustees Thereof
Defendant:
RH Mullen, Inc., Mullen Company, LLC and The R.H. Mullen Corporation doing business as RH Mullen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chenier v. R.H. White Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv40156
Plaintiff:
Korey Chenier
Defendant:
R.H. White Construction Co., Inc., R.H. White Companies, Inc., L.H. White & Son, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Estate of Confessor Hichez-Zapata et al v. Emerecia et al
as 1:2021cv04261
Plaintiff:
Robert Hichez as Administrator of the Estate of Confessor Hichez-Zapata (Pending) o/b/o R.H. (minor) and Y.H. (minor), Estate of Confessor Hichez-Zapata, Robert Hichez and others
Defendant:
John Hancock Retirement Services, Quenia D. Emerecia and IUOE Local 15 Annuity Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McIntosh v. Suprenant, et al
as 1:2017cv00206
Defendant:
Pike Industries, Inc., R.H. White Construction Co., Inc., Brox Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Scott McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Northwestern Ohio Plumbers and Pipefitters Active Health and Welfare Fund et al v. R.H. Taylor Mechanical Contractors, Limited Liability Company et al
as 2:2013cv13386
Plaintiff:
Northwestern Ohio Plumbers and Pipefitters Active Health and Welfare Fund , Northwestern Ohio Plumbers and Pipifitters Retiree Health and Welfare Fund , Northwestern Ohio Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
R.H. Taylor Mechanical Contractors, Limited Liability Company and Ross H. Taylor
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund et al v. R.H. Taylor Mechanical Contractors, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv11349
Plaintiff:
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund , Plumbers Local 98 Defined Contribution Fund , Plumbers Local 98 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
R.H. Taylor Mechanical Contractors, LLC and Ross Taylor
R.H. v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
R.H.
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross and Lifewise Health Plan of Washington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION & ANNUITY FUNDS et al v. R.H. SUMMERS CORP. MASONRY & CONCRETE CONTRACTORS
as 3:2012cv03420
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION & ANNUITY FUNDS and RICHARD E. TOLSON
Defendant:
R.H. SUMMERS CORP. MASONRY & CONCRETE CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Zdziarski et al v. Swanson et al
as 1:2009cv07571
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Zdziarski, Cheryl Zdziarski, Cheryl Zdziarski and others
Defendant:
David C. Swanson, Michael P. Connors, Thomas J. Reddin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Apprenticeship and et al v. R.H. Reliant Floor Covering
as 2:2008cv07433
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Apprenticeship and, Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Southern California Floor Covering Apprenticeship and, Contract Administration Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
R.H. Reliant Floor Covering
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
