Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5019
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Lu v. Davis, et al
as 22-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee: KEVIN DAVIS, TYLER OSTHOLTHOFF, ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES NORTHEAST, INC. and others
Interested Party: ABM INDUSTRY GROUPS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5060
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lu v. Davis, et al
as 21-1306
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH SULLIVAN, DOMINIC BLUE, STEVE POFTAK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Interested Party: ABM INDUSTRY GROUPS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10898
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020mc91220
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DeBarros v. Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, et al
as 20-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELSON M. DEBARROS
Defendant / Appellee: ELSPETH B. CYPHER, in her official capacity as Associate Justice of SJC, RALPH D. GANTS, in his official capacity as Chief Justice of SJC, KIMBERLY SUZANNE BUDD, in her official capacity as Associate Justice of SJC and others
Mullane v. Gants, et al
as 19-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN MULLANE
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH D. GANTS, MAURA T. HEALEY, in both her individual and official capacity, MICHELE HOGAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?