Cases 1 - 10 of 9,601
RAMOS ABAD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12320
Plaintiff:
FREDDY RAMOS ABAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMOS
as 1:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
SAIRA RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Powell v. New York City Comptroller et al
as 1:2023cv04618
Plaintiff:
Claude O. Powell, Jr.
Defendant:
New York City Comptroller, NYPD - 28th Precinct, Police Officer Narain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Calderon et al
as 4:2023cv05078
Plaintiff:
Levar D Anderson
Defendant:
Cheyenne Calderon, Caden Calderon, Jorge Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Gonzalez-Lopez et al v. Municipality of San Juan et al
as 3:2023cv01278
Plaintiff:
Monica E. Gonzalez-Lopez and Jose L. Rodriguez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Municipality of San Juan, Mayor Miguel A Romero-Lugo, Supervisory Officers John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12073
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Imelda Esquivel Ramos, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2295
Petitioner:
Imelda Esquivel Ramos and B.F.R.E.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Ramos
as 23-6071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC MANUEL RAMOS
GOODMAN v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11780
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GOODMAN, BRANDON KOENIG-MESSER, RYAN LOIBL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
