Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Pittman v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Visa USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03279
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L.B. Kelly and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023hc02168
Petitioner:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
In re: Randy Pittman
as 23-12358
Petitioner:
In re: RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv02367
Petitioner:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pittman v. City of Waveland, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
City of Waveland, Mississippi and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Randy Pittman
as 22-10234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN
Pittman et al v. City of Waveland, Mississippi et al
as 1:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman and Rachel Powell
Defendant:
City of Waveland, Mississippi and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
