Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Cabrera v. Randy Mitchell d/b/a Evergreen Enterprises
as 4:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Bertran Cabrera
Defendant:
Randy Mitchell d/b/a Evergreen Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Randy Mitchell
as 13-50509
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY MITCHELL, AKA Frog
Thomas v. Chevron U S A Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Randy Mitchell Thomas
Defendant:
Chevron U S A Inc and Texaco Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Thomas v. Texaco Co Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
Randy Mitchell Thomas
Defendant:
Texaco Inc and Chevron U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Randy Copenhaver v. Brian Gardner, et al
as 13-1006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy Mitchell Copenhaver
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Gardner, Michael J. Carr and Dr. Robert Braksiek
Irizary v. Booth et al
as 7:2012cv00513
Defendant:
Janet Booth, Randy Mitchell and Michael Shupe
Plaintiff:
Frank Irizary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irizary v. Booth et al
as 1:2012cv01182
Plaintiff:
Frank Irizary
Defendant:
Janet Booth, Randy Mitchell and Michael Shupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Randall David Kimsey by its Executor Lorna M. Kimsey et al v. Boone County, Iowa et al
as 4:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
Estate of Randall David Kimsey by its Executor Lorna M. Kimsey and Lorna M Kimsey
Defendant:
Boone County, Iowa, Ronald D Fehr, Gregg Elsberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Time Warner Cable Information Services LLC v. Public Service Commission of South Carolina et al
as 3:2011cv03094
Plaintiff:
Time Warner Cable Information Services LLC
Defendant:
Public Service Commission of South Carolina, John E Howard, David A Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
