Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayford v. Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv13012
Defendant:
Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC, MPCM Services and Amanda Breasbois
Plaintiff:
Tonzania Rayford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rayford v. Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Tonzania Rayford
Defendant:
Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC, Amanda Breasbois and MPCM Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Burns
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rayford Burns, Annex Pizza & Event Hall and Rayford Burns doing business as Annex Pizza & Event Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hall-Rayford et al v. Owens et al
as 2:2022cv12714
Plaintiff:
Mary Hall-Rayford, Karen Beltz, Karen Mouradjian and others
Defendant:
Monique Owens and Eastpointe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rayford v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02766
Petitioner:
Ariq Rayford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rayford v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02782
Plaintiff:
Chenoa D. Rayford
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02720
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rayford Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Ariq Rayford
as 19-6352
Defendant / Appellant:
ARIQ RAYFORD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
