Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BROWN v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2023cv04948
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and LAKEISHA A. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
ZAKEN, BUZAS, KAPOLKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
DOUGLAS H.E. CAMPBELL, LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. OFFICER #2356 et al
as 2:2022cv04169
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Defendant:
Lt. Brian Crawford, Officer David Alston, Sgt. Kamari Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. OFFICER TORIBIO
as 2:2022cv03713
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
OFFICER TORIBIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2022cv02953
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
COOPER, TARRANT THOMAS and DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COHEN et al
as 2:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
DENIS P. COHEN, MARK A. HINRICHS and HELEN FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv17827
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Harris #6034 et al
as 2:2020cv05354
Defendant:
Police Officer Andy Yun #4527, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Police Officer Harris #6034
Plaintiff:
Raymond Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. M. ADAMS et al
as 2:2020cv03847
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and M. ADAMS
Petitioner:
RAYMOND BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
