Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CARPENTER v. RE/MAX. LLC
as 3:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
RE/MAX. LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGuire et al v. Carey et al
as 3:2020cv00249
Defendant:
Re/Max, LLC, Anne Carey, Jospeh Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Neil McGuire and Patrick McGuire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv22291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Salma Agha-Khan v. USA, et al
as 17-56842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D., an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Eastern District of California, FREDERICK CLEMENT, US Bankruptcy Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Westley v. Jose Alberto, et al
as 16-10666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WESTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE L. ALBERTO, RE/MAX LLC, VERONA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC. and others
:
JP MORGAN CHASE
Westley v. Alberto et al
as 1:2016cv20283
Plaintiff:
Westley and JOHN D. WESTLEY
Defendant:
Alberto, Thomas Walsh, GLEN RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
