Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Shakeyra Bradley v. Jurion Hopkins, et al
as 26-12436
Plaintiff:
SHAKEYRA K. BRADLEY
Defendant:
JURION HOPKINS, REGAN & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, SMITH DIMENT CONERLY LLP and others
REGAN v. BAYLESS
as 1:2026cv02366
Petitioner:
BRIAN REGAN
Respondent:
BAYLESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Regan v. Columbia Gorge Housing Authority et al
as 1:2026cv03127
Plaintiff:
Natasha A Regan
Defendant:
Columbia Gorge Housing Authority and Mid-Columbia Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Dowden v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 3:2026cv01038
Plaintiff:
Nancy Roncati Dowden
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, McCarter & English LLP, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Sandford v. Constable et al
as 3:2026cv02015
Plaintiff:
Floyd Sandford
Defendant:
David E Constable, John C Regan, Joseph L Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
REGAN v. YORK COUNTY SHERIFF AND JAIL COMPLEX
as 2:2026cv00296
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B REGAN
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF AND JAIL COMPLEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manivong v. City of Redding et al
as 2:2026cv01900
Plaintiff:
Phetakhom Tu Manivong
Defendant:
City of Redding, Lauren Meyers, Regan Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
