Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 152
KAREM v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02514
Defendant: STEPHANIE A. GRISHAM and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff: BRIAN J. KAREM
Amicus Curiae: PEN AMERICAN CENTER, INC., WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS' ASSOCIATION and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2019cv02401
Plaintiff: COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2019cv02125
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Martin, et al v. Rollins
as 19-1629
Plaintiff / Appellee: K. ERIC MARTIN and RENE PEREZ
Defendant: WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Police Commissioner for the City of Boston
Defendant / Appellant: RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, in her Official Capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County
Amicus Curiae: SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, NEW YORK TIMES and others
Empower Texans, Incorporated, et al v. Charlie Geren We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-50577
Plaintiff / Appellant: DESTIN R. SENSKY, BRANDON C. WALTENS and EMPOWER TEXANS, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLIE L. GEREN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Committee on House Administration of the Texas House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
NBC 7 SAN DIEGO et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01146
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Plaintiff: TOM JONES, NBC 7 SAN DIEGO and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
United States of America v. Schulte
as 19-1048
Defendant / Appellant: Joshua Adam Schulte
Not Yet Classified: United States of America
Petitioner: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant: Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae: Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL CITED, QUOTED, OR REFERENCED IN THE REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT S. MUELLER III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019mc00045
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
In Re: APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL CITED, QUOTED, OR REFERENCED IN THE REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT S. MUELLER III
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant: BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae: MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?