Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Ferris
as 20-1313
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
In re: RICHARD D. FERRIS
Ferris v. Gainey et al
as 1:2018cv00721
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Ferris
Defendant:
Trinity Gainey, Michael Gallo and James Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jana McCoy, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A, et al
as 11-80194
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JANA MCCOY, HENRY MITCHELL, JEFF HUBER and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION
Kenneth Bain et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 8:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Gwen Bain, Kenneth Bain, Brian Bermudes and others
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
IN RE Medical Capital Securities Litigation
as 8:2010ml02145
Defendant:
Ameriprise Financial Inc, Bank of New York Mellon, Capital Financial Holdings Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gwen Bain, Kenneth Bain, Brian Bermudes and others
Miscellaneou:
Steven Masonek
Bain et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2009cv02218
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bain, Josephine Biscay, Carol Boghosian and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bain et al v. Robertson et al
as 1:2009at00992
Plaintiff:
Kenneth and Gwen Bain, Josephine Biscay, Carol Boghosian and others
Defendant:
Judith & Gerald Robertson, Palmer Casey Zimmerman, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ferris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00357
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Ferris, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
