Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Resendiz v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00974
Plaintiff: Robert Resendiz
Defendant: Maricopa, County of, Jeffrey Alvarez, Richard Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 21-8031
Defendant / Appellee: COLLEEN LANE, DAVID W. PERINO, PATRICIA E. LANE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00235
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00209
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00204
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Abbott v. US
as 21-1167
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD DUNN, VERONICA CORELLA-BARUD, HARRY FLEMING and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16637
Defendant / Appellee: GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 2:2020cv00161
Defendant: Colleen Lane, Charles Hingle, Bank of Jackson Hole and others
Plaintiff: Richard Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16026
Defendant / Appellee: GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Derubbio et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05306
Plaintiff: jessica derubbio, Zamani Davis, Kim Chang and others
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?