Cases 1 - 10 of 83
HINES v. LOWE
as 2:2026cv00345
Plaintiff:
COLBY D. HINES
Defendant:
RICHARD HOWARD LOWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Watkins v. People of the State of California
as 2:2025cv01974
Petitioner:
Richard Howard Watkins
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv04217
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LATTIMORE v. WILKERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Defendant:
MARY ANN JOHNSON, CARRETTA WILKERSON, GENEVA GRIMMAGE-THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER DAMON LATTIMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tongsun Kim, et al v. Richard Bernstein, et al
as 24-2108
Defendant:
ELIZABETH M. WELCH, KYRA HARRIS BOLDEN, BRIAN K. ZAHRA and others
Plaintiff:
TONGSUN KIM and GWANJUN KIM
Clemons v. Green
as 5:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Transportation Officer Green
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05434
Petitioner:
RICHARD HOWARD
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brumfield vs Howard, et al
as 1:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Marquis Dushan Brumfield
Respondent:
Richard Howard, Chris Corsbie, Chris Clapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. United States of America
as 23-3481
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD HOWARD WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07812
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
