Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cooper v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05550
Defendant: Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Cooper
Coffman v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09527
Defendant: Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Guy Coffman
Coffman v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05283
Defendant: Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Guy Coffman
Rauf v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08980
Defendant: Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Amir Rauf
Stein v. Perceptron, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01444
Defendant: Perceptron, Inc., William C. Taylor, John F. Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Shiva Stein
Arturo Prado v. Cindy Huggins, et al
as 16-50223
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTURO PRADO
Defendant - Appellee: CINDY HUGGINS, CSR No. #2739, the official Court Reporter for the 216th Judicial District Court for Gillespie County, Texas, CLAY STEADMAN, Attorney at Law, MICHELLE L. HENRICKS, Director, Court Reporters Certification Board, in her official and individual capacities and others
Prado v. Huggins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00943
Defendant: Stephen Ables, Velma Arellano, Donna Collins and others
Plaintiff: Arturo Prado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. NEELY et al
as 1:2015cv00872
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JIWAN HAIRSTON
Defendant: RICHARD NEELY, JOSEPH VALLIERE and ROBERT WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIRSTON v. NEELY
as 1:2015cv00834
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TIWAN HAIRSTON
Defendant: RICHARD NEELY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myron Nunn v. N.C. Legislation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-6902
Plaintiff - Appellant: MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Defendant - Appellee: N.C. LEGISLATION, FRANK PERRY, GEORGE T. SOLOMON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?