Torts - Injury Cases
Palmer v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20365
Plaintiff: Richard Palmer
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
PALMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59551
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIGGS et al v. PALMER et al
as 1:2018cv02356
Plaintiff: GLADYS HIGGS, MELINDA JENKINS and VICTORIA HIGGS
Defendant: MELANIE SCOTT-BOWLING, KHOSROW DAVACHI, RICHARD PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv12356
Plaintiff: Richard Lane , Richard Palmer and Lea Sutherland-Doane
Defendant: United States of America, Philip Powell and F/V Foxy Lady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Palmer v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05519
Plaintiff: Richard Palmer
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01283
Plaintiff: Susan Palmer and Richard Palmer
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PALMER et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv00644
Plaintiff: RICHARD PALMER
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sweet v. The Central New York Psychiatric Center Marcy et al
as 6:2007cv00507
Plaintiff: Karim Sweet
Defendant: The Central New York Psychiatric Center Marcy, H.E. Smith, Charles A. Buscema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?