Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Gardipee v. Evers et al
as 2:2021cv00579
Respondent:
Todd Delain and Anthony Steven Evers
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Richard Gardipee v. Lynn Adelman
as 19-2091
Respondent:
LYNN ADELMAN
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Gardipee v. Carr et al
as 2:2019cv00666
Respondent:
Kevin Carr and Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc., Ortho-McNeil- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Gardipee v. Kurt Picknell, et al
as 19-1108
Respondent:
PHILLIP A. KOSS, WALWORTH COUNTY, WISCONSIN, KRISTINE DRETTWAN and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Gardipee v. Cavil et al
as 2:2018cv01314
Defendant:
Ryan Cavil and The Detail Shop
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardipee v. Ashwaubenon Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2018cv00796
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Respondent:
Ashwaubenon Department of Public Safety, Village of Ashwaubenon and Ashwaubenon Village Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ALLEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMAS ALLEN and SANDRA LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith, Richard v. Martin et al
as 3:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin , Tammy Maassen, Tidquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. CNH America LLC
as 1:2009cv01098
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas
Defendant:
CNH America LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
