Cases 31 - 40 of 159
United States of America v. Mora (Contrera)
as 20-4083
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Mora, Love Brooks, William Fabian Mora, AKA Will, AKA Little Will and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Leo Contrera
RICHBURG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv15751
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
SARA RICHBURG
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHBURG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09482
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE RICHBURG
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. MCCRAINE
as 3:2020cv05462
Defendant:
T MCCRAINE, C CATTNACH, D DICE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHBURG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44791
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICHBURG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gash v. Davis et al
as 9:2019cv03314
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Lamar Gash
Defendant:
Dr. Kevin Burnham, Sgt. Samuel Catoe, Lt. Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Logan v. J. Schrock, et al
as 19-14599
Defendant / Appellee:
A. RICHBURG, Sgt., Z. GORDON, A. ALLIGOOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
LOGAN v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2019cv03793
Defendant:
Z GORDON, A RICHBURG, J ELLIOT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LODAN and JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
