Cases 41 - 50 of 60
RICHEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01653
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY RICHEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Verser v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Stephen Duncan, Michael Gilreath, Jason Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komoscar et al v. Pence et al
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Komoscar and Kelly A Komoscar
Defendant:
Michael R Pence , Mary Beth Bonaventura , Indiana Department of Child Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunmore v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
James E Dunmore
Defendant:
Stephen B Duncan, Donald Stolworthy, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortes v. Stolworthy et al
as 3:2015cv00690
Plaintiff:
Sergio Cortes
Defendant:
Donald Stolworthy, Joseph Yurkovich, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sultan v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
Charles Sultan
Defendant:
Steven Duncan, Roger Moore, A/W Treadway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Obaisi et al
as 1:2014cv09399
Plaintiff:
Jason Richey
Defendant:
Saleh Obaisi and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC v. RICHEY et al
as 1:2013cv02006
Defendant:
ARGENT MORTGAGE, CO., LLC, MICHAEL A. BENEDICT, CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB and others
Plaintiff:
TEC INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Richey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01072
Plaintiff:
Troy Lewis Richey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hewitt et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 3:2013cv10464
Plaintiff:
Rachel Hewitt , Susan Hurlbutt , Nikita Jackson and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
