Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Rowlett v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv01379
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Rowlett
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Richard Worley, Jonathan Amey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Timothy Riha v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Timothy Riha
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Riha v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Rebel S. Riha
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Catharine Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05007
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00811
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Robin Riha v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2021cv08433
Plaintiff:
ROBIN RIHA
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and HCA, INC. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RIHA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv33363
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RIHA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
