Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Federico v. Blalock et al
as 2:2018cv02786
Defendant:
Sean Locksa, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, J Blalock and others
Plaintiff:
Renaldo Federico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Navarro et al
as 3:2018cv01964
Defendant:
O. Navarro, E. Ramirez, E. Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02613
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Veshi, Elisa Ramunno and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lena v. Coley et al
as 3:2018cv01570
Defendant:
Warden William Paramo, Xavier Beccera, People of the State of California at "RJ Donovan State Prison's Receiving and Release" and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Miller v. Cliff et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Lance Cliff, Chaffee County Detention Center, RJ Carland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. Loesch et al
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff:
Denard Antwaun Rowell
Defendant:
Jeremy Loesch, N&S Towing Inc, Dodge County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long et al v. Herrington et al
as 4:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Daemez L. Long, Taiwo Onamuti and Maleek Davis
Defendant:
Ron Herrington, Gibson, Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
as 3:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
Carlton Fields
Defendant:
RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres Romo v. RJ Donovan Warden et al
as 8:2016cv00525
Respondent:
Paramo and RJ Donovan Warden
Petitioner:
Andres Romo
Kane v. RJ Donovan State Prison
as 3:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elias Kane
Defendant:
RJ Donovan State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
