Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nembhard v. Williamson County, Texas
as 23-50207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Imani Nembhard
Defendant / Appellee:
Williamson County, Texas and Robert Chody
FILING ERROR
as 1:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Charles Duval, Robert Chody, Big Fish Entertainment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Williamson County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00388
Defendant:
Charles Duval, Robert Chody, Big Fish Entertainment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watsky v. Williamson County et al
as 1:2021cv00374
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mark Luera, Sheriff Robert Chody, Williamson County and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Watsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nembhard v. Williamson County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00350
Defendant:
Robert Chody, Williamson County, Texas and Christopher Pisa
Plaintiff:
Imani Nembhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornburg v. Williamson County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
John Does, Williamson County, Texas, Lorenzo Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Charles William Thornburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reposa v. Chody et al
as 1:2019cv01110
Plaintiff:
Adam T. Reposa
Defendant:
Robert Chody, Nicole Warren, Williamson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NETIS v. SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv00200
Defendant:
JUDY VALOIS, JASON J. HYDE, JYOTHI RACHA and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAL NETIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NETIS v. SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv01517
Defendant:
ERNEST CODILIS, SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS) and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAL NETIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearns v. Chody
as 1:2018cv00115
Respondent:
Officer Robert Chody
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Kearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
