Cases 11 - 20 of 83
King et al v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2020cv13134
Plaintiff:
Daren Rubingh, Charles Ritchard, Timothy King and others
Defendant:
Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Jocelyn Benson, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, City of Detroit, Michigan Democratic Party and others
Amicus Curiae:
Michigan State Conference NAACP
Interested Party:
Scott Hagerstrom, Julia Haller, Brandon Johnson and others
USA v. Robert Davis
as 20-2118
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Elections, Janice Winfrey, Jocelyn Benson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05107
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Toni M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hill and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Janice Winfrey, Jocelyn Benson, Detroit Deparment of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn Davis v. Sherry Burt
as 20-1829
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLENN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, Warden
Davis v. Benson et al
as 1:2020cv00768
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson and Mario Morrow
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Benson et al
as 3:2020cv12130
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett and Jocelyn Benson
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Wayne County Board of Canvassers
as 2:2020cv12127
Plaintiff:
Venias Jordan, Jr., Leigh Reed-Pratt, Robert Davis and others
Defendant:
Wayne County Board of Canvassers
Petitioner:
Kym Worthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
