Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Meyers et al v. Oxford, Village of et al
as 2:2017cv10623
Defendant:
Oxford, Village of , Joe Young , Sue Bossardet and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Meyers , Kallie Roesner-Meyers and Eugenia Calocassides
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram et al v. Oasis Investments, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jason Ingram and Dilenia Ingram
Defendant:
Oasis Investments, LLC, Nathan K. Verning, Leecor Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson et al v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv14197
Plaintiff:
Rufus Deon Wilson and John Robert Davis
Defendant:
Michael C. Martin, Labron Edward Nunn, Joseph C. Nether and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pointer aka Robert Davis Jr v. Minton et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Demetric A Pointer aka Robert Davis Jr
Defendant:
Minton, Harvey, Coppinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Robert Davis v. Kathleen MacDonald, et al
as 16-2528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN MACDONALD, Wayne County Circuit Judge, STEVEN SCHILLER, Emergency Manager of Highland Park and DENNIS POLLARD
Robert Davis v. Ruth Johnson, et al
as 16-2499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
RUTH JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. COLOMBO, JR.
Davis v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv13545
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson , Cathy M. Garrett , Wayne County Election Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Davis v. MacDonald et al
as 2:2016cv13039
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Kathleen MacDonald, Steven Schiller and Dennis Pollard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
