Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Alexander Gifford v. Estate of George Bush, et al
as 21-1228
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General, ROBERT MUELLER, III, Former FBI Director, ESTATE OF GEORGE BUSH, Former President and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROY GIFFORD
Heghmann v. Obama et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Defendant:
Rod Rosenstein, Robert Mueller, III, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Heghmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Dale Adams v. DOJ, et al
as 16-41138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Phelps v. Bosco et al
as 1:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Phelps
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, Margaret C. Drake, New York State Office of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adams v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2012mc00305
Plaintiff:
Dale B. Adams
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Attorney General, Eric Holder, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Watters v. Mueller et al
as 5:2012cv01777
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Watters
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ESTRADA v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2011cv00940
Plaintiff:
PANNA ESTRADA
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO , ROBERT MUELLER, III , ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Haddad v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2010cv04234
Plaintiff:
Khaldoun Haddad
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, Ruth Dorchoff, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
