Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Valley v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
Robert Valley
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant:
KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
Orlando Baez v. Jin Byunghak, et al
as 20-1809
Defendant / Appellee:
ELDON MWAURA, ROBERT DERRY, RICK FRASER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO BAEZ
Justin Robertson v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 20-1066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN J. ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE, Superintendent at SCI Greene, DR. ARTHUR M. SANTOS, ROBERT VALLEY, Former, Medical Director and others
Lamont Zamichieli v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3305
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE HICE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NATALIE AUSTIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT ZAMICHIELI
Alton Brown v. Wexford Health Sources Inc, et al
as 19-1809
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTHUR M. SANTOS, W. A. MYERS, JR., CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN R. BEABOUT
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01338
Defendant:
MICHAEL HICE, ROBERT GILMORE, DR. AUTHOR SANTOS and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN J. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JUDGE v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
ROGER JUDGE
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, ROBERT VALLEY and CONSILIUM STAFFING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
