Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Robert Washington v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 13-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOMICIDE UNIT, SUPERVISORS AUTHORITY OFFICIALS, JOHN DOE, OFFICER ROCKS and EDWARD J., Officer
WASHINGTON v. DORAN et al
as 2:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
KAAS DORAN, MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00897
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., ROCKS and EDWARD J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Doran et al
as 3:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Kaas Doran, Michael McCloskey, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Atchison
as 1:2012cv10236
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Mike Atchison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis-El v. Bland
as 8:2011cv03222
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington Francis-El
Defendant:
Marilynn M. Bland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Washington v. Madlock, et al
as 11-2481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MADLOCK and ATTY GEN PA
Michael Hamilton v. Warden Wilkson, et al
as 11-30189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILKSON, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Washington v. Uribe et al
as 1:2011cv01054
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr. and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Washington v. Domingo Uribe, et al
as 10-56642
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DOMINGO URIBE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
