Cases 51 - 60 of 421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Galguera et al
as 3:2022cv01299
Petitioner:
Allan Robinson
Respondent:
Juan Galguera and Joel Nazario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Robinson v. City of New Bedford et al
as 1:2022cv10942
Plaintiff:
Sterling Robinson
Defendant:
City of New Bedford, Nathaniel Goncalo, Michael Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISMAIL et al v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
AHMED ISMAIL
Defendant:
PHILLIP ROBINSON and OFFICER WRIGLEY
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kathy R. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kathy Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Moller
as 22-1227
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER, a/k/a Michael Robinson
Interested Party:
FARMERS STATE BANK OF OAKLEY and WEBSTER BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
