Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AXIA HOLDINGS LLC v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
AXIA HOLDINGS, LLC and AXIA HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JAMES W. ROBINSON, US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, RICHIE A. ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Redmond et al
as 3:2016cv01953
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dion Robinson
Defendant:
Nigel Howard Redmond and Anthony Pargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30805
Plaintiff:
RODERICK E. ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
ROBINSON v. MCNEIL
as 1:2009cv00113
Petitioner:
RODERICK L ROBINSON
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aldridge et al v. City of Memphis
as 2:2008cv02019
Plaintiff:
Martha Aldridge, Martha Aldridge, James R. Baker and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis and City of Memphis
Miscellaneou:
Dewun R. Settle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andrews et al v. Panter et al
as 4:2007cv00200
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Rodney Class, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Deanell Recca Tacha, Jerry Lee Andrews, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robinson v. Wilson
as 3:2007cv00087
Petitioner:
Roderick L Robinson
Respondent:
William Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
