Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Briggs v. City of Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2023cv01662
Plaintiff:
Kary Jarvis and Damien Briggs
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach, Kelly Copeland and Roger Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Curn
as 7:2021cv00631
Plaintiff:
Roger Lawson
Defendant:
Larry Curn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Socal Recovery, LLC, et al v. City of Costa Mesa, et al
as 20-55820
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LAWSON and SOCAL RECOVERY, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-100 and CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation
Socal Recovery, LLC, et al v. City of Costa Mesa, et al
as 19-56077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LAWSON and SOCAL RECOVERY, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-100 and CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation
Lawson v. Jackson-Wilson
as 3:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
Roger Lawson
Defendant:
Shawn A. Jackson-Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Nicola Taysom v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-35021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLA JO NEWCOMB TAYSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States, JOSEPH BIDEN, Vice President of the United States, US CABINET MEMBERS and others
Newcomb Taysom v. O'bama et al
as 4:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicola Jo Newcomb Taysom
Defendant:
Barack O'bama, Joseph Biden, US Cabinet Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05624
Plaintiff:
WESLEY S. CHANDLER , AZIZUDDIN ABDUR-RA'OOF , BILL BARNETT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawson v. East Hampton Planning & Zoning Comm
as 3:2007cv01270
Plaintiff:
Roger Lawson
Defendant:
East Hampton Planning & Zoning Comm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
