Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ronald Emrit v. Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 26-12645
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, MURDOCH FAMILY TRUST, FIFA and others
Roku, Inc. v. Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
as 1:2026cv02309
Plaintiff:
Roku, Inc.
Defendant:
Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Emrit v. Murdoch et al
as 2:2026cv01279
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Go Go Satish, The Greatest Recording Artist
Defendant:
Rupert Murdoch, Murdoch Family Trust, FIFA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EMRIT v. MURDOCH et al
as 2:2026cv08664
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, SATISH DAT BEAST and GO GO SATISH
Defendant:
RUPERT MURDOCH, MURDOCH FAMILY TRUST, FIFA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Satish Dat Beast v. Murdoch et al
as 1:2026cv01395
Plaintiff:
Satish Dat Beast and Go Go Satish
Defendant:
Rupert Murdoch, Murdoch Family Trust, FIFA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Beast v. Murdoch et al
as 3:2026cv01110
Plaintiff:
Satish Dat Beast and Go Go Satish
Defendant:
Rupert Murdoch, Murdoch Family Trust, FIFA and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Roku, Inc., v. Quanta Computer Inc.
as 5:2026cv05911
Petitioner:
Roku, Inc.,
Respondent:
Quanta Computer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Roku, Inc. v. Squires
as 1:2026cv01127
Plaintiff:
Roku, Inc.
Defendant:
John A Squires and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Else v. Roku, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv00748
Plaintiff:
Terri Else
Defendant:
Roku, Inc. and TTE Technology, Inc., d/b/a TCL North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
