Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Ronald Sharp
as 21-3828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD SHARP
Sharp v. Louisville Metro Housing Authority
as 3:2019cv00400
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sharp
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Sharp v. Hardie et al
as 1:2017cv03157
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sharp , Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew J. Hardie and Snowy Owl Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lasley et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
Donivan Lasley , David Deuser , Gary Fogler and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARPE v. WALKER et al
as 2:2015cv01246
Plaintiff:
RONALD SHARPE
Defendant:
JEFFREY WALKER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARPE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv06632
Plaintiff:
RONALD SHARPE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gray v. Parish of Livingston et al
as 3:2012cv00212
Defendant:
Delos Blackwell, Marshall Harris, Joan Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Dorian Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St Machinery Equip v. Livingston Parish, et al
as 08-31245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT SALES INC
Defendant - Appellee:
LIVINGSTON PARISH, WAYNE MARTIN, MARSHALL HARRIS and others
Sharp v. Rentway et al
as 5:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sharp
Defendant:
Rentway, The Manager and Two Employees
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
State Machinery & Equipment Sales, Inc. v. Livingston Parish et al
as 3:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
State Machinery & Equipment Sales, Inc., State Machinery & Equipment Sales, Inc. and State Machinery & Equipment Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Livingston Parish, Wayne Martin, Marshall Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
