Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Eaton v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04082
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roy Douglas Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARVEY, JOHN MARCUM, EDGAR NEFF and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eaton v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roy Douglas Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HAMMOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08701
Plaintiff:
ROY DOUGLAS HAMMOCK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Douglas v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Roy Douglas
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Dulaney et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01054
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Betty Dulaney and Roy Douglas Dulaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMMOCK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv87930
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROY DOUGLAS HAMMOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. SSA
as 7:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Roy Douglas Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Laster v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2016cv00669
Plaintiff:
Roy Douglas Laster
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
