Cases 1 - 10 of 38
USA v. Rufus Williams
as 23-2773
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
USA v. Rufus Williams
as 23-2387
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Truck, a/k/a Nappy Head
USA v. Rufus Williams
as 23-2317
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RUFUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Truck, a/k/a Nappy Head
Spectrum FML, INC v. The Phoenix Holding Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01300
Plaintiff:
Spectrum FML, INC and Spectrum FML, Inc.
Defendant:
The Phoenix Holding Company, Inc., Rudy Williams and Mr. Rudy ("Rufus") Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis v. Williams
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Felissa A. Davis
Defendant:
Rufus Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS and CREAGHAN HARRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 3:2020cv20424
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, ANTHONY DIPIETRO and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17942
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 1:2020cv09404
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER K. CAIN, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant:
LINDA A. HYNES, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM, DEPUTY CT. ADMIN. TASHESIA HICKMOND and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
