Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fred Gonzales v. Rashida Jones, et al
as 24-7049
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Rashida Jones, Owner and CEO of MSNBC, Mark Thompson, Owner and CEO of CNN, Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox and Friends News Network and others
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ron Newt v. Rupert Murdock et al
as 2:2015cv02778
Defendant:
Lee Daniels, Terrence Howard, Rupert Murdock and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Newt
Bertsch v. 20th Century Fox Television et al
as 3:2012cv05029
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Bertsch
Defendant:
20th Century Fox Television, Rupert Murdock, 20th Century Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salaam v. Gaggiano et al
as 1:2010cv02944
Defendant:
Dr. Bannerman, M.D., Dr. E. Brathwaite, M.D., John Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Aziz Salaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salaam v. Gaggiano et al
as 1:2010cv04727
Plaintiff:
Aziz Salaam
Defendant:
Gaggiano, Tuft, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC
as 09-7612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York, VENABLE LLP, of Maryland and New York and others
In re: In Re: David Kissi, et al
as 09-3425
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Respondent:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR.
David Kissi v. Pramco II, et al
as 09-3281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, DLA PIPER, of MD and NY, VENABLE LLP, of MD and NY and others
Kissi v. Pramco II LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
David Kissi
Defendant:
Pramco II LLC, DLA Piper, Venable LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
